Foundem’s Comments on Google’s Revised Proposals
November 22nd, 2013
Today, we are publishing Foundem’s Comments on Google’s Revised Proposals (PDF).
Categories: Google
Comments are closed.
Featured
- A Timeline of Google's EU & US Antitrust Probes
(updated August 2024) - The DMA: Antitrust 2.0 for the Tech Superpowers (November 2022)
- The Consumer Harm of Google's Search Manipulation Practices (December 2016)
- Understanding the EC's Dramatic 2014 U-Turn in the Google Search Case
- WIRED: Google's Nemesis: the British couple who cost Google £2.1 billion
- Podcast: Foundem's interview with WIRED Magazine
- Debunking Google's Search for Harm
Recent Posts and Articles
- Google's CSS Auction: Different Name, Same Illegal Conduct
- Fake CSSs: Why Google is encouraging online Ad Agencies to pose as CSSs
- Non-Compliance Part 1: Why a pay-for-placement auction cannot provide the required equal treatment within Google's SERPs
- Non-Compliance Part 2: How Google could easily comply with the Decision in a way that is both pro-competitive and infinitely better for users
- Non-Compliance Part 3: Why Google's "promise" to run its CSS at a notional "profit" is just meaningless internal accounting
- Non-Compliance Part 4: Why Google's CSS Auction is a thinly-veiled continuation of the same abuse
- Implementing and Monitoring an Equal Treatment Remedy (March 2017)
- Debunking Google's SSO Arguments (December 2016)
- Debunking the Key Evidence in the Streetmap v Google Trial
- Foundem's July 2014 Response to Google's 3rd Proposals
- Foundem's Comments on Google’s 2nd Proposals
- Foundem's Analysis of Google's 1st Proposals
- Open Letter to Commissioner Almunia from 11 Complainants
- Foundem Remedy Proposals Part II January 2013: The Even-Handed Principle
- Foundem Remedy Proposals June 2012
- Would the Real Search Neutrality Please Stand Up
- The Google Bamboozle: Deconstructing Google’s Response to the Senate Antitrust Subcommittee
- A Video Deconstruction of Google's Testimony to the Senate Antitrust Subcommittee
- Penalties, Self-Preferencing, and Panda: Why Google's Behaviour Makes Antitrust Sanctions Inevitable
- Google's "Original Content" Mantras
- Foundem's New York Times Op-Ed
- Foundem's Preferencing Data
- Making the Case for Search Neutrality
In The Press
- WIRED: Google's Nemesis: the British couple who cost Google £2.1 billion
- Podcast: Foundem's interview with WIRED Magazine
- New York Times: The Case Against Google
- CNBC: Google has lost its halo
- Fining Google: a slow train coming
- ArsTechnica: A brief history of Google's Competition battle in the EU
- Channel 4 News: Google Fine Protects Competition and Consumer Choice
- The Telegraph: How a British couple sparked Google's battle with Europe
- WirtschaftWoche: Two Against the Google Goliath
- Financial Times: Brussels piles new charges on Google as Vestager digs in
- TechCrunch: 10 Slides Debunking Google's Antitrust Defense Of Its Shopping Comparison Service
- The Wall Street Journal: The British Couple Who Began Google's Antitrust Battle
- Die Welt: Shivaun Raff is Google's Toughest Opponent
- TAZ: Europe against Google
- IDG News: Google rival slams EU Commission over antitrust settlement proposals
- Law360: EU Antitrust Leader Misrepresented Google Deal...
- The Register: 'Fatal flaws' in Google's revised search antitrust overhaul, says Foundem
- Le Monde: Antitrust : premières critiques contre les dernières propositions de Google
- The Guardian: Google v European Commission: what's the issue over 'vertical search'?
- The Guardian: Google accused of slowing down EC's antitrust case
- IDG News: Google rival Foundem urges EU to reject remedies
- Financial Times: Google’s antitrust settlement under attack by rivals
- New York Times: Executives Press EU Antitrust Chief on Google
- Washington Post: Google search practices draw scrutiny of EU antitrust officials
- The Guardian: Google could face 'tsunami of litigation' claims Foundem
- The Guardian: Google's Panda update put some websites on endangered species list
- The Register: Antitrust nemesis accuses Google of 'WMD program'
- The Register: Google contradicts own counsel in face of antitrust probe
- The Times: Slings are out to bring down Google goliath
- New York Times: Google Trying to Avoid Antitrust Fight in Europe
- New York Times: Europe Opens Antitrust Inquiry into Google
- Der Spiegel: The EU Inquiry into Google
- The Register: Why the Google antitrust complaint is not about Microsoft
- The Times: EU launches antitrust inquiry into Google
- Financial Times: Google taken to task over its objectivity
- BBC News: Google faces European competition inquiry
- Der Spiegel: How Anti-Competitive is Google?
- The Guardian: Foundem accuses Google...
- European Voice: Searching questions for EU as small firm takes on giant
- The Economist: Engine trouble: The European Union is right to take a closer look at Google
- Time Magazine: The EU Probe: Is Google Rigging Its Search Results?
- The Register: Google's antitrust probe spin answered
- The Register: Watchdog backs Google antitrust complaint with (more) data
Contact Us
Categories
Archives
- September 2024
- November 2022
- November 2021
- September 2020
- November 2019
- November 2018
- July 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- June 2015
- April 2015
- July 2014
- March 2014
- November 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- September 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- January 2011
- March 2010
- February 2010